BayesIQ

Governed Analytics

Your data tells a story. Make sure it's the right one.

BayesIQ delivers governed analytics — whether you need us hands-on or want the platform embedded in your workflow. Every finding reviewed. Every decision attributed.

How BayesIQ works

Every finding reviewed. Every decision attributed.

Hands-on consulting or the platform in your workflow — the same chain from raw output to approved deliverable, and every transition evidence-backed.

Layer 1raw truthLayer 2derived interpretationLayer 3governed state

Three layers of truth

Every piece of information moves through three distinct layers. Nothing reaches operational state without explicit human acceptance. The layers are the invariant — they apply to every engagement, every pipeline, every decision.

  • Raw Data

    Raw Truth · Immutable evidence

    No summaries, no interpretations. Just the record. Pipeline outputs, test results, call transcripts, emails — the ground truth your decisions rest on.

  • Reviewed

    Derived Interpretation · Structured output

    AI-generated proposals, extracted tasks, priority assessments, and summaries. Clearly labeled as interpretation, not fact. Never auto-promoted to operational state.

  • Approved

    Governed State · Human-accepted truth

    The only layer that drives dashboards, deadlines, and work state. Nothing reaches this layer without explicit human acceptance. This is your single source of governed truth.

Interactive · try it

Nothing reaches governed state without a human yes.

Click a source to send a record in. It lands in raw truth, gets interpreted, then waits for review. Only an approval makes it governed.

1–5
send a source
enter
approve
r
reject

Industries

Every industry breaks its own way

We know what breaks in each one because we have audited it. Pick yours to see the failure patterns and a representative finding.

Representative finding

Revenue metrics built on transaction pipelines that nobody has audited end-to-end.

Reported revenue

$1.2M

Actual revenue

$960K

$240K overstatement found. 1,200 dropped transaction records and a fee calculation error in the settlement pipeline.

Reliability score

5284+32 pts

Score moved from 52 to 84 out of 100.

Common failure patterns

  • 01

    Revenue metrics that don't match finance

    Product analytics show one revenue number. Finance shows another. Metric validation recomputes KPIs from raw transaction data to show exactly where currency conversion logic, refund handling, or phantom events introduce the gap.

  • 02

    Payment event telemetry with gaps

    Transaction events fire from multiple clients and payment processors. Required fields like currency, payment_method, or transaction_id are null 5-20% of the time. Schema profiling catches null spikes before they reach downstream aggregations.

  • 03

    Compliance reporting on unaudited pipelines

    SAR filing counts, transaction monitoring volumes, and KYC completion rates are built from the same pipelines as product dashboards. A scored audit with severity-ranked findings shows exactly which pipeline issues affect compliance numbers.

ResultA mid-market payments processor found a $340K annual revenue discrepancy and 1,200 silently dropped transaction records.

Works with your stack · read-only

  • Snowflake
  • BigQuery
  • Redshift
  • dbt
  • Looker
  • Tableau
  • Mode
  • Metabase
  • Streamlit

How we work

A repeatable, six-stage pipeline

Every engagement follows the same sequence, so nothing gets missed and every finding traces back to source data.

  1. 01

    Ingest

    Connect to your warehouse and load datasets. Read-only access, no production changes.

  2. 02

    Profile

    Scan schemas, column types, null rates, cardinality, and distributions across every table.

  3. 03

    Check

    Run 40+ automated quality checks: uniqueness, referential integrity, accepted values, freshness, near-duplicate detection.

  4. 04

    Validate

    Recompute KPIs from source data and compare against production dashboards. Flag every metric that diverges.

  5. 05

    Score

    Assign a 0-100 reliability score based on check results, weighted by severity and business impact.

  6. 06

    Generate

    Produce the audit report, dbt project, metric contracts, and interactive dashboards from validated data.

Engagement tiers

Start with a one-week diagnostic

The sprint fee is 100% credited toward a full engagement.

1 week

Diagnostic Sprint

A fast, low-friction entry point. We connect to your warehouse, run our automated pipeline, and deliver a severity-ranked scorecard of the top issues in your data systems.

  • Scored audit report (0-100)
  • Top findings ranked by severity
  • Remediation priorities
  • Executive summary + technical detail

4-6 weeks

Most popular

Full Engagement

End-to-end: from warehouse connection to validated dashboards. We audit your data, formalize metric definitions, build the fix, and hand it off to your team.

  • Everything in Diagnostic Sprint
  • ASSUMPTIONS.md (data contracts)
  • METRICS.md (canonical definitions)
  • dbt project with 40+ tests
  • Interactive Streamlit dashboards
  • Drift detection and monitoring

Ongoing

Continuous Monitoring

After the engagement ends, automated monitoring keeps your metrics honest. Drift detection, freshness alerts, and quarterly reviews ensure regressions are caught early.

  • Automated drift detection
  • Freshness and volume alerting
  • Quarterly audit reviews
  • Priority support for new metrics